Gynecol Surv 2001 Jan;56(1):50-9
Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy.
Fatum M, Rojansky N.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Hadassah Ein-Kerem Medical Center, The Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.
In the last decade, operative laparoscopic procedures are performed increasingly in both gynecology and general surgery. The major advantages of this newer minimally invasive approach are: decreased postoperative morbidity, less pain and decreased need for analgesics, early normal bowel function, shorter hospital stay, and early return to normal activity. With the advancement of laparoscopic surgery, its use during pregnancy is becoming more widely accepted. The most commonly reported laparoscopic operation during pregnancy is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Other laparoscopic procedures commonly performed during pregnancy include: management of adnexal mass, ovarian torsion, ovarian cystectomy, appendectomy, and ectopic pregnancy. The possible drawbacks of laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy may include injury of the pregnant uterus and the technical difficulty of laparoscopic surgery due to the growing mass of the gravid uterus. Also, the potential risk of decreased uterine blood flow secondary to the increase in intraabdominal pressure and the possible risk of carbon dioxide absorption to both the mother and fetus should be taken into account. To date, data on laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy are insufficient to draw conclusions on its safety and exact complication rate. This is due to the few cases reported and the lack of prospective studies. Furthermore, there is a common tendency to underreport unsuccessful cases. Finally, most reports in the literature come from centers and surgeons with special interest, experience, and skills in laparoscopy, and their results may not reflect the real complication rates. We have reviewed the pertinent English literature from the last decade. The cumulative experience suggests that laparoscopic surgery may be performed safely during pregnancy, although more studies are needed to establish its exact rate of adverse events.
Endosc 2000 Mar;14(3):267-71
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and interventional endoscopy for gallstone complications during pregnancy.
Sungler P, Heinerman PM, Steiner H, Waclawiczek HW, Holzinger J, Mayer F, Heuberger A, Boeckl O.
I. Chirurgische Abteilung und Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut fur experimentelle und gastroenterologische Chirurgie, Landeskliniken Salzburg, Austria.
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic or complicated gallstone disease is the most common reason for nongynecological operations during pregnancy. Gallstones are present in 12% of all pregnancies, and more than one-third of patients fail medical treatment and therefore require surgical endoscopy or laparoscopy. Gallstone pancreatitis and jaundice during pregnancy is associated with a high recurrence rate, exposing both fetus and mother to an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. METHODS: During a 4-year period, all pregnant patients (n = 37) with symptomatic or complicated gallstone disease were studied prospectively at the Landeskrankenhaus in Salzburg, Austria. Five patients had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) for biliary pancreatitis or jaundice; two of these underwent subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Another seven patients required laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe pain or cholecystitis; all were in their 13th-32nd gestational week. Access was established by Veress needle in all cases. Insufflation pressure was 8-10 mm Hg, and mean operative time was 62 min. RESULTS: All patients delivered full-term, healthy babies. There were no postendoscopic or postoperative complications. All patients enjoyed full relief from their symptoms; there were no recurrences of pancreatitis or jaundice. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers a safe and effective option for the definitive treatment of complicated gallstone disease and intractable pain during pregnancy, and there is sufficient access for the combined treatment to be employed.
J Surg 1999 Dec;178(6):523-9
The laparoscopic management of appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy.
Affleck DG, Handrahan DL, Egger MJ, Price RR.
Latter-day Saints, Hospital Department of Surgery, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, USA.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic management of appendicitis and symptomatic cholelithiasis during pregnancy remains controversial. We report the single largest series of laparoscopic cholecystectomies and appendectomies during pregnancy. METHODS: Medical records of all pregnant patients who underwent open or laparoscopic management of appendicitis/cholelithiasis at LDS Hospital from 1990 to 1998 were reviewed. RESULTS: Eighteen open appendectomies (OA) and 13 open cholecystectomies (OC) were performed. Forty-five laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) and 22 laparoscopic appendectomies (LA) were performed without birth defects, fetal loss or uterine injury. Preterm delivery rates (PTD) in the LA and OA groups were similar (15.8% versus 11.8%, P>0.9). The PTD rate in the LC group was not significantly different than in the OC group (11.9% versus 10.0%, P>0.9). Neither birth weights nor Apgar scores were significantly different across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic management of appendicitis and symptomatic cholelithiasis during pregnancy can be performed with minimal fetal and maternal morbidity when accepted management guidelines are followed.
Management of gallbladder stones during pregnancy: conservative treatment or laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
Daradkeh S, Sumrein I, Daoud F, Zaidin K, Abu-Khalaf M.
Jordan University Hospital and Amman Surgical Hospital, Jordan. email@example.com
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) during pregnancy is still controversial, we report our experience in the management of 42 pregnant patients suffering from symptomatic gallbladder stones. METHODOLOGY: Between June 1993 and July 1998, we performed 1700 LC's. During this period we dealt with 42 pregnant patients who had symptoms of gallbladder stones. Following an initial period of conservative management, only 16 patients underwent LC during pregnancy and 26 patients responded to medical management and were operated upon later on after delivery. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were operated upon successfully during pregnancy, 2 in the 1st trimester, 10 in the 2nd trimester and 4 in the 3rd trimester. No complications occurred and all patients carried on their pregnancies to term and delivered healthy babies. CONCLUSIONS: From our experience and from the review of the literature on this subject, LC during pregnancy is safe, however the indications should be restricted to patients with complications or to those suffering from repeated and persistent symptoms not responding to medical management.
Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999 Aug;6(3):347-51
Pregnancy and laparoscopic surgery.
Lachman E, Schienfeld A, Voss E, Gino G, Boldes R, Levine S, Borstien M, Stark M.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Misgav Ladach Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
We reviewed the English literature regarding laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy and found that of 518 reported procedures, the most common was cholecystectomy (45%), followed by adnexal surgery (34%), appendectomy (15%), and other operations (6%). We add six cases to this list; three cholecystectomies, an adnexal procedure, and two for abdominal pain. Thirty-three percent were performed in the first trimester, 56% in the second, and 11% in the third trimester. This review demonstrates a definite trend, indicating that laparoscopy in pregnancy appears to be safe when performed by experienced practitioners. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6(3):347-351, 1999)